PricewaterhouseCoopers, one of Britain's largest accountancy firms, has launched an investigation after male staff at one of its branches in Ireland were found circulating emails where they rated the attractiveness of their female colleagues.
But just for the record, reading from left to right, top row first: 6, 7, 8, 9, 7, 8, 7, 7, 7, 6, 8, 6, 7.
3 comments:
My own marks given a few days ago - http://notasheepmaybeagoat.blogspot.com/2010/11/6577696787777.html - were 6,5,7,7,8,7,7,6,9,6,7,7,7
We seem to differ hugely on numbers 2, 4 and 9. Your given average is 7.15 and mine 7.62. But what does that prove?
It proves that I go for the fresh faced blondes with pronounced cheek bones and protein rich hair (good brreding stock?), whereas your ratings correlate with earring usage, which is a new one for me.
You may have something here re 'breeding stock', as I have no interest in breeding! However the earring factor has me somewhat puzzled as you seem to have a point there as well...
Post a Comment